Skip to content
You're offline — some features may be unavailable
Snap
Count
Fantasy Football Tools & Analytics
Home
My Teams
the nest
Dynasty
the legacy
Tools
the hunt
Rankings
Redraft & Dynasty rankings
Start/Sit Optimizer
Weekly decisions
Trade Analyzer
Fairness scoring
Draft Assistant
Mock drafts & ADP
Waivers & Trends
Pickups & ownership trends
Ask the OWL
Fantasy advisor
View All Features →
Research
the perch
NFL Schedule
Game times & bye weeks
Market Intel
Vegas lines & props
Injury Report
Weekly reports & play %
Strength of Schedule
Easiest matchups
NFL News
News, cap casualties & free agency
Leaderboards
Season scoring leaders & accuracy
Trade Database
Real anonymized trades with verdicts
The OWL's Eye
Weekly analysis & insights
Community
the hoot
SnapGrid
Daily 3x3 fantasy grid puzzle
SnapPicks
One tap, one choice — community values
Trade Block
Players on the market across leagues
Forums
Community forums
Beat Reporters
Insider intel feed
Help Center
Common questions
Discord
Join the conversation
Pricing
⌘K
Sign In
Get Started
Loading...
Home
My Teams
Rankings
Dynasty
Tools
Zachariah Branch Fantasy Football 2026 (WR, ATL) | SnapCount
Rankings
/
Zachariah Branch
ZB
Zachariah Branch
#17
WR
ATL
Age 22
Rookie
Georgia
SnapCount Score
Overall Rank
#157
WR Rank
WR57
SC Score
43.2
Flex
Tier
Flex
SnapCount Score measures overall player quality (0-100). Higher = stronger weekly outlook.
PPR
5.5
pts/game
Half PPR
4.4
pts/game
Standard
3.3
pts/game
Floor
2026 Schedule Outlook
How ATL's WR matchups stack up across the full 2026 season.
Easy Schedule
League rank
#8 of 32
— avg opponent defensive rank
18.1
Favorable Weeks
2, 4, 14, 15, 17, 18
Hard Weeks
5, 12, 13
Compare with Similar Players
TT
Tre Tucker
WR55 — 8.7 PPG
DS
De'Zhaun Stribling
WR56 — 5.9 PPG
JD
Josh Downs
WR58 — 9.7 PPG
XW
Xavier Worthy
WR59 — 10.5 PPG
Start/Sit
Compare with another player
Trade Value
Check dynasty trade value
Full Rankings
See all player tiers
4.4
pts/game
Ceiling
7.1
pts/game
Why this rank:
solid efficiency — composite score 43.2.
SC ↑28 vs consensus
Efficiency
50
Projections
23
Environment
50
