Skip to content
You're offline — some features may be unavailable
Snap
Count
Fantasy Football Tools & Analytics
Home
My Teams
the nest
Dynasty
the legacy
Tools
the hunt
Rankings
Redraft & Dynasty rankings
Start/Sit Optimizer
Weekly decisions
Trade Analyzer
Fairness scoring
Draft Assistant
Mock drafts & ADP
Waivers & Trends
Pickups & ownership trends
Ask the OWL
Fantasy advisor
View All Features →
Research
the perch
NFL Schedule
Game times & bye weeks
Market Intel
Vegas lines & props
Injury Report
Weekly reports & play %
Strength of Schedule
Easiest matchups
NFL News
News, cap casualties & free agency
Leaderboards
Season scoring leaders & accuracy
Trade Database
Real anonymized trades with verdicts
The OWL's Eye
Weekly analysis & insights
Community
the hoot
SnapGrid
Daily 3x3 fantasy grid puzzle
SnapPicks
One tap, one choice — community values
Trade Block
Players on the market across leagues
Forums
Community forums
Beat Reporters
Insider intel feed
Help Center
Common questions
Discord
Join the conversation
Pricing
⌘K
Sign In
Get Started
Loading...
Home
My Teams
Rankings
Dynasty
Tools
Chris Bell Fantasy Football 2026 (WR, MIA) | SnapCount
Rankings
/
Chris Bell
CB
Chris Bell
#18
WR
MIA
Age 22
Rookie
Louisville
Questionable (Knee - ACL)
SnapCount Score
Overall Rank
#183
WR Rank
WR67
SC Score
38.8
Bench
Tier
Bench
SnapCount Score measures overall player quality (0-100). Higher = stronger weekly outlook.
PPR
6.2
pts/game
Half PPR
5.1
pts/game
Standard
4.0
pts/game
Floor
2026 Schedule Outlook
How MIA's WR matchups stack up across the full 2026 season.
Medium Schedule
League rank
#15 of 32
— avg opponent defensive rank
16.6
Favorable Weeks
1, 7, 12
Hard Weeks
4, 9, 13
Compare with Similar Players
JR
Jayden Reed
WR65 — 9.5 PPG
CB
Chris Brazzell
WR66 — 4.4 PPG
TD
Tank Dell
WR68 — 4.4 PPG
MG
Matthew Golden
WR69 — 8.5 PPG
Start/Sit
Compare with another player
Trade Value
Check dynasty trade value
Full Rankings
See all player tiers
4.4
pts/game
Ceiling
7.1
pts/game
Why this rank:
solid efficiency — composite score 38.8.
SC ↑20 vs consensus
Efficiency
50
Projections
23
Environment
50
