Skip to content
You're offline — some features may be unavailable
Snap
Count
Fantasy Football Tools & Analytics
Home
My Teams
the nest
Dynasty
the legacy
Tools
the hunt
Rankings
Redraft & Dynasty rankings
Start/Sit Optimizer
Weekly decisions
Trade Analyzer
Fairness scoring
Draft Assistant
Mock drafts & ADP
Waivers & Trends
Pickups & ownership trends
Ask the OWL
Fantasy advisor
View All Features →
Research
the perch
NFL Schedule
Game times & bye weeks
Market Intel
Vegas lines & props
Injury Report
Weekly reports & play %
Strength of Schedule
Easiest matchups
NFL News
News, cap casualties & free agency
Leaderboards
Season scoring leaders & accuracy
Trade Database
Real anonymized trades with verdicts
The OWL's Eye
Weekly analysis & insights
Community
the hoot
SnapGrid
Daily 3x3 fantasy grid puzzle
SnapPicks
One tap, one choice — community values
Trade Block
Players on the market across leagues
Forums
Community forums
Beat Reporters
Insider intel feed
Help Center
Common questions
Discord
Join the conversation
Pricing
⌘K
Sign In
Get Started
Loading...
Home
My Teams
Rankings
Dynasty
Tools
Caleb Douglas Fantasy Football 2026 (WR, MIA) | SnapCount
Rankings
/
Caleb Douglas
CD
Caleb Douglas
#7
WR
MIA
Age 22
Rookie
Texas Tech
Questionable (Undisclosed)
SnapCount Score
Overall Rank
#240
WR Rank
WR92
SC Score
32.4
Bench
Tier
Bench
SnapCount Score measures overall player quality (0-100). Higher = stronger weekly outlook.
PPR
3.5
pts/game
Half PPR
2.8
pts/game
Standard
2.2
pts/game
Floor
2026 Schedule Outlook
How MIA's WR matchups stack up across the full 2026 season.
Medium Schedule
League rank
#15 of 32
— avg opponent defensive rank
16.6
Favorable Weeks
1, 7, 12
Hard Weeks
4, 9, 13
Compare with Similar Players
PB
Pat Bryant
WR87 — 5.9 PPG
TF
Troy Franklin
WR88 — 5.3 PPG
EA
Elic Ayomanor
WR90 — 4.0 PPG
DV
Devaughn Vele
WR91 — 5.4 PPG
Start/Sit
Compare with another player
Trade Value
Check dynasty trade value
Full Rankings
See all player tiers
2.4
pts/game
Ceiling
3.8
pts/game
Why this rank:
solid efficiency — composite score 32.4.
SC ↑759 vs consensus
Efficiency
50
Projections
12
Environment
50