Skip to content
You're offline — some features may be unavailable
Snap
Count
Fantasy Football Tools & Analytics
Home
My Teams
the nest
Dynasty
the legacy
Tools
the hunt
Rankings
Redraft & Dynasty rankings
Start/Sit Optimizer
Weekly decisions
Trade Analyzer
Fairness scoring
Draft Assistant
Mock drafts & ADP
Waivers & Trends
Pickups & ownership trends
Ask the OWL
Fantasy advisor
View All Features →
Research
the perch
NFL Schedule
Game times & bye weeks
Market Intel
Vegas lines & props
Injury Report
Weekly reports & play %
Strength of Schedule
Easiest matchups
NFL News
News, cap casualties & free agency
Leaderboards
Season scoring leaders & accuracy
Trade Database
Real anonymized trades with verdicts
The OWL's Eye
Weekly analysis & insights
Community
the hoot
SnapGrid
Daily 3x3 fantasy grid puzzle
SnapPicks
One tap, one choice — community values
Trade Block
Players on the market across leagues
Forums
Community forums
Beat Reporters
Insider intel feed
Help Center
Common questions
Discord
Join the conversation
Pricing
⌘K
Sign In
Get Started
Loading...
Home
My Teams
Rankings
Dynasty
Tools
Carnell Tate Fantasy Football 2026 (WR, TEN) | SnapCount
Rankings
/
Carnell Tate
CT
Carnell Tate
#14
WR
TEN
Age 21
Rookie
Ohio State
SnapCount Score
Overall Rank
#77
WR Rank
WR20
SC Score
55.8
Starter
Tier
Starter
SnapCount Score measures overall player quality (0-100). Higher = stronger weekly outlook.
PPR
13.1
pts/game
Half PPR
10.9
pts/game
Standard
8.6
pts/game
Floor
2026 Schedule Outlook
How TEN's WR matchups stack up across the full 2026 season.
Hard Schedule
League rank
#25 of 32
— avg opponent defensive rank
15.2
Favorable Weeks
1, 7, 13, 16
Hard Weeks
2, 4, 5, 10, 12, 14, 18
Compare with Similar Players
DM
DK Metcalf
WR18 — 12.8 PPG
MN
Malik Nabers
WR19 — 14.5 PPG
DA
Davante Adams
WR21 — 12.8 PPG
RO
Rome Odunze
WR22 — 13.4 PPG
Start/Sit
Compare with another player
Trade Value
Check dynasty trade value
Full Rankings
See all player tiers
9.1
pts/game
Ceiling
14.8
pts/game
Why this rank:
solid efficiency — composite score 55.8.
SC ↓16 vs consensus
Efficiency
50
Projections
48
Environment
50