Skip to content
You're offline — some features may be unavailable
Snap
Count
Fantasy Football Tools & Analytics
Home
My Teams
the nest
Dynasty
the legacy
Tools
the hunt
Rankings
Redraft & Dynasty rankings
Start/Sit Optimizer
Weekly decisions
Trade Analyzer
Fairness scoring
Draft Assistant
Mock drafts & ADP
Waivers & Trends
Pickups & ownership trends
Ask the OWL
Fantasy advisor
View All Features →
Research
the perch
NFL Schedule
Game times & bye weeks
Market Intel
Vegas lines & props
Injury Report
Weekly reports & play %
Strength of Schedule
Easiest matchups
NFL News
News, cap casualties & free agency
Leaderboards
Season scoring leaders & accuracy
Trade Database
Real anonymized trades with verdicts
The OWL's Eye
Weekly analysis & insights
Community
the hoot
SnapGrid
Daily 3x3 fantasy grid puzzle
SnapPicks
One tap, one choice — community values
Trade Block
Players on the market across leagues
Forums
Community forums
Beat Reporters
Insider intel feed
Help Center
Common questions
Discord
Join the conversation
Pricing
⌘K
Sign In
Get Started
Loading...
Home
My Teams
Rankings
Dynasty
Tools
Miles Davis Fantasy Football 2026 (RB, CAR) | SnapCount
Rankings
/
Miles Davis
MD
Miles Davis
#37
RB
CAR
Rookie
Utah State
SnapCount Score
Overall Rank
#362
RB Rank
RB114
SC Score
36.5
Waiver
Tier
Waiver
SnapCount Score measures overall player quality (0-100). Higher = stronger weekly outlook.
PPR
5.5
pts/game
Half PPR
5.1
pts/game
Standard
4.7
pts/game
Floor
2026 Schedule Outlook
How CAR's RB matchups stack up across the full 2026 season.
Hard Schedule
League rank
#26 of 32
— avg opponent defensive rank
15.4
Favorable Weeks
2, 3, 6, 13, 18
Hard Weeks
4, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17
Compare with Similar Players
KC
Kadarius Calloway
RB130 — 5.5 PPG
AC
Anderson Castle
RB131 — 6.1 PPG
TC
Ty Chandler
RB133 — 2.6 PPG
BB
Brittain Brown
RB134 — 5.6 PPG
Start/Sit
Compare with another player
Trade Value
Check dynasty trade value
Full Rankings
See all player tiers
3.3
pts/game
Ceiling
8.3
pts/game
Why this rank:
Composite score of 36.5 based on production, efficiency, and age curve analysis.
SC ↑9999637 vs consensus
Efficiency
0
Projections
22
Environment
50
